Consumer Protection Act Case Law V N Shrikhande Vs Anita Sena Fernandes Youtube Supreme court of india v.n.shrikhande vs anita sena fernandes on 20 october, 2010 author: g.s. singhvi bench: asok kumar ganguly, g.s. singhvi non reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.8983 of 2010 (arising out of slp(c) no.5479 of 2009) dr. v.n. shrikhande. Reasoning. decision. v.n shrikhande (dr.) v. anita sena fernandes . g.s singhvi, j.— leave granted. this appeal is directed against the order of the national consumer disputes redressal commission (for short “the national commission”) whereby the order passed by the maharashtra state consumer disputes redressal commission (for short.
V N Shrikhande V Anita Sena Fernandes Pdf She has complained of having trouble with abdominal pain in 1993. the doctors in there advised her to consult with dr. v.n. shrikhande (appellant) residing in dadar, mumbai, having a hospital. after examining the pathologist’s report the appellant performed an open cholecystectomy on 26.11.1993 and thereafter revealed the respondent had. October 20, 2010 civil appeal no. 8983 of 2010 (arising out of slp(c) no.5479 of 2009) dr. v.n. shrikhande ⠦⠦ appellant versus mrs. anita sena fernandes ⠦⠦ respondent j u d g m e n t g.s. singhvi, j. 1. lea … read more at case laws. 8. having failed to elicit favourable response from the appellant on the issue of compensation, the respondent filed complaint under section 17 of the consumer protection act, 1986 (for short, `the act'), which came to be registered as complaint case no.116 of 2004 and claimed compensation of rs.50 lakhs by alleging that due to negligence of the appellant, a mass of gauze was left in her. V.n.shrikhande vs anita sena fernandes on 20 october, 2010. showing the contexts in which consumer appears in the document. change context size current. 1. leave granted. 2. this appeal is directed against the order of the national consumer disputes redressal commission (for short, `the national commission') whereby the order passed by the.
Pdf V N Shrikhande Vs Anita Sena Fernandes Memorial On Be 8. having failed to elicit favourable response from the appellant on the issue of compensation, the respondent filed complaint under section 17 of the consumer protection act, 1986 (for short, `the act'), which came to be registered as complaint case no.116 of 2004 and claimed compensation of rs.50 lakhs by alleging that due to negligence of the appellant, a mass of gauze was left in her. V.n.shrikhande vs anita sena fernandes on 20 october, 2010. showing the contexts in which consumer appears in the document. change context size current. 1. leave granted. 2. this appeal is directed against the order of the national consumer disputes redressal commission (for short, `the national commission') whereby the order passed by the. It was submitted on the part of the o.p. dr. shrikhande that in the complaint filed by complainant mrs. anita fernandes, she had levelled charges of medical negligence against him for the operation dr. shrikhande had performed on 26.11.1993 where dr. shrikhande had operated her for gall bladder ailment and ultimately she was discharged from the. Having failed to elicit favourable response from the appellant on the issue of compensation, the respondent filed complaint under section 17 of the consumer protection act, 1986 (for short, 'the act'), which came to be registered as complaint case no. 116 of 2004 and claimed compensation of rs. 50 lakhs by alleging that due to negligence of the.
Comments are closed.